●Case Study
Harbor Logistics
Harbor did not need a dashboard that demos well. They needed screens that do not tire you out.
●The problem
Harbor needed speed, not polish.
Operators had a decade of habits in the old system, so any change had to earn its disruption. The ninety-percent happy path was easy. The ten percent that goes wrong is where the real work lived, on warehouse terminals that are old and stay old.
●The problem
Services
- Research,
- UX/UI,
- Web Development
●What we did
We designed for the eighth hour.
Keyboard-first navigation, persistent context, and a status language that can be read peripherally. Nothing in the interface asks to be admired. Exception handling became the centre of the design rather than an afterthought, with every failure state given a named recovery path.
●What we learned
Internal tools deserve more, not less.
These are the people who cannot choose to leave, which raises the bar rather than lowering it. Average time to resolve an exception dropped by a third within the first month of rollout.
Next projectSaga Editorial→
Saga EditorialSaga EditorialSaga EditorialSaga Editorial
Saga EditorialSaga EditorialSaga Editorial